Huh. So that was.
Sep. 26th, 2009 11:52 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Just got back from seeing "The Time Traveler's Wife", and here are my candid thoughts:
I kinda thought it sucked.
No, really. I mean, I know I will probably lose my girl card for saying so, but while I thought the premise was interesting, and Rachel McAdams' ass was worth the $3.50 I paid, I was disturbed by plot holes that gaped bigger than a SanFran queen's ass, shmaltz deemed too cheesy for a Hallmark commercial, and the creepiest child actors ever given a SAG card.
Now, let's be frank here. I'm a big cry baby when it comes to chick flicks. Hell, I cry at Kodak commercials, cotton commercials, and songs from the 80's. I'm the Goddess of shmoopy shit. This movie felt so forced, with its predictable plotline, leading score, and endless effort to build touching moments in the meadow that it forgot to make us actually give a damn about the characters. I've seen horror movies where I was rooting for the villains more than I was rooting for this couple. I think much of that comes from awkward introductions, both to us and to each other. Instead of developing characters, they try to make you like them quickly with sympathy, so they can hurry up and get to the time traveling, and it just feels pushy.
The child actors in this are unremarkable, except for their unremarkableness. The little girl looks like a troll doll that was melted in a horrific microwave accident. I just couldn't feel anything for her. The boy isn't much better, though thankfully we are subjected to far less of him.
The plot has huge holes in it. We know that Henry can't time travel on demand, so he was never able to save his mother or, obviously, himself. We also know that his daughter can control her time travel, and travel outside her own life span, so why couldn't she go back and save her grandmother and her father? Inexcusable mistake that destroyed the rest of the movie for me, not that there was much left to destroy.
Here's the biggest problem this movie had for me: it was as anticlimactic as a withered penis after a long night of whiskey dick sex. We know Henry is going to die. It is smeared in our faces constantly that he is going to die. We know the year, we know the place, we know the how, so when he actually dies, instead of feeling sorry for his grieving widow and melted troll daughter, you are left thinking, "Finally!" Don't get too excited, though, because we still need to have one final goopy scene in the sun dappled meadow so he can tell them to stop waiting for him and they can walk off hand in hand like the end of a douche commercial, leaving only the audience with that "not so fresh feeling".
I suggest giving this one a miss.
I kinda thought it sucked.
No, really. I mean, I know I will probably lose my girl card for saying so, but while I thought the premise was interesting, and Rachel McAdams' ass was worth the $3.50 I paid, I was disturbed by plot holes that gaped bigger than a SanFran queen's ass, shmaltz deemed too cheesy for a Hallmark commercial, and the creepiest child actors ever given a SAG card.
Now, let's be frank here. I'm a big cry baby when it comes to chick flicks. Hell, I cry at Kodak commercials, cotton commercials, and songs from the 80's. I'm the Goddess of shmoopy shit. This movie felt so forced, with its predictable plotline, leading score, and endless effort to build touching moments in the meadow that it forgot to make us actually give a damn about the characters. I've seen horror movies where I was rooting for the villains more than I was rooting for this couple. I think much of that comes from awkward introductions, both to us and to each other. Instead of developing characters, they try to make you like them quickly with sympathy, so they can hurry up and get to the time traveling, and it just feels pushy.
The child actors in this are unremarkable, except for their unremarkableness. The little girl looks like a troll doll that was melted in a horrific microwave accident. I just couldn't feel anything for her. The boy isn't much better, though thankfully we are subjected to far less of him.
The plot has huge holes in it. We know that Henry can't time travel on demand, so he was never able to save his mother or, obviously, himself. We also know that his daughter can control her time travel, and travel outside her own life span, so why couldn't she go back and save her grandmother and her father? Inexcusable mistake that destroyed the rest of the movie for me, not that there was much left to destroy.
Here's the biggest problem this movie had for me: it was as anticlimactic as a withered penis after a long night of whiskey dick sex. We know Henry is going to die. It is smeared in our faces constantly that he is going to die. We know the year, we know the place, we know the how, so when he actually dies, instead of feeling sorry for his grieving widow and melted troll daughter, you are left thinking, "Finally!" Don't get too excited, though, because we still need to have one final goopy scene in the sun dappled meadow so he can tell them to stop waiting for him and they can walk off hand in hand like the end of a douche commercial, leaving only the audience with that "not so fresh feeling".
I suggest giving this one a miss.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 05:19 am (UTC)I am sorry you had to suffer, though.
Review was better than the movie.
Date: 2009-09-27 05:25 am (UTC)Re: Review was better than the movie.
Date: 2009-09-27 06:33 am (UTC)Re: Review was better than the movie.
Date: 2009-09-27 06:36 am (UTC)I don't see the disconnect here. Would you rephrase? I don't think Alba attempted to stop it.
Re: Don't forget
Date: 2009-09-27 06:37 am (UTC)Re: Don't forget
Date: 2009-09-27 06:48 am (UTC)I suppose I've lived too long with the very common time travel rule of not interfering with your past self, because the very act of doing so will alter the future in ways you can't forsee, but in this story it is okay to interact in some ways but impossible to interact in others, and, again, that all seems a bit too convenient. If you are able to go back in time to tell someone that someone is going to die, by the same laws you should be able to go back in time to prevent death, or be able to tell your Past self how to prevent that death. It should be all or nothing, I guess is what I'm trying to say. Either you can interact with the past or future, or you can't.
This is just too blurry for me. If you are going to do a science fiction love story, DO a science fiction love story. Don't half ass it.
Agreed.
Date: 2009-09-27 02:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 06:35 am (UTC)It was truly awful in its mediocrity.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 07:06 am (UTC)It is fun to watch him hate movies, though.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 06:07 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 06:30 am (UTC)The rest of the movie, however, was awful.
Here's another joyful little spoiler for you. She keeps having miscarriages because their baby keeps time traveling out of her womb. Cheerful, right? If that doesn't lick the fucked up icing right off the fucked up cake, I don't know what does.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 06:48 am (UTC)Damn. The imagery. I could say more, but I'll leave it to those more appropriate to comment.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 06:59 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 06:53 am (UTC)I'm wondering if we will ever see a yogurt that stops you up, and if so, will they market it to men?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 06:58 am (UTC)*grins*
I think we could sell it. I used to know a lot of military guys who would go on field exercises and beg, borrow, and steal other people's peanut butter and cheese from the MRE's to stop themselves up so they wouldn't have to dig latrine pits. You know if we can market it to the military we'd make the big bucks.
no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 07:04 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 11:35 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 12:33 pm (UTC)I didn't go see the movie because my husband assured me it was going to suck. Now I have strong confirmation that he was right. :-D
no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 03:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-27 11:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-09-28 01:30 am (UTC)What kills me is the end, I couldn't quite tell in the hunting scene - did he or did he not actually shoot his time-traveled self and in rather fucked up way, commit suicide? In a way, that would improve the movie if he did. ;)
Idk. I found it interesting but not something I could think about too terribly much. I mean, time-travel that comes on without warning, takes you wherever it wants, mostly for a period of <10 minutes (save that two weeks he was gone over Christmas), makes you repeat agony from your past over and over, which you have zero control over ... wtf is the point of that? Worst Supernatural Gift Ever.
And I hate the name Alba. :P
no subject
Date: 2009-09-28 03:25 am (UTC)And I'm right there with you on both the fuckedupedness and the name hatred. Alba just makes me think of albacore tuna, and who names their kid after a fish?
no subject
Date: 2009-09-28 02:00 pm (UTC)The movie was lighter then the book. Some things were "niced up" for an American movie audience and made some of the story make much less sense. There was a lot of things that were more real and much more emotionally impacting in the novel. But I think that this is the kind of storyline that you like or hate. Much like Benjamin Button, which I also liked. Sorry to hear that you didn't like it. It leads me to believe that you won't give the book a try.
Just because I loved the book, I have to argue in favor of the movie as well. Both Henry and Alba can travel outside of their lifespans, but neither one can control thier time travel. Alba knows better when she is going to go, basically she has more warning then Henry, but she can't control where she is going to. Also, Henry has always tried to change his mother's death and is never able to. Basically what is in the past is in the past.
But, That being said. If you are ever feeling generous, givethe book a shot.